John, I as I understood we don't have any real artificial/ interacting ATC in FGFS. That means the messages are more or less just for fun. If we use a generic rwy no we could argument that it is the wrong rwy for the given wind.
The better solution would be to program a working/ interacting ATC as MSFS shows as an example Regards HHS > Overheard at KSFO in FG: > > >>> Golf Foxtrot Sierra Cleared to land > > This is not realistic. It would be quite unusual for > SFO > Tower to give a landing clearance without specifying which > runway. > > Suggestion: > Cessna Golf Foxtrot Sierra, runway one zero right, cleared > to land > ^^^^^^ > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Reference: ATC-order-7110-65s section 3-5-10(a). > > Even in situations when Tower is arguably not required to > restate the landing runway, they tend to do it anyway: > > Reference: http://www.liveatc.net/search/?icao=ksfo > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Return on Information: > Google Enterprise Search pays you back > Get the facts. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
