On 12/12/2009 10:25 AM, Heiko Schulz wrote: > I as I understood we don't have any real artificial/ interacting ATC in FGFS. > That means the messages are more or less just for fun. > If we use a generic rwy no we could argument that it is the wrong rwy for the > given wind. > > The better solution would be to program a working/ interacting ATC as MSFS > shows as an example
If you want to implement an interactive AI ATC function, that would be great. In the meantime, I am reminded of the proverb: Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. There is already a method apt->getActiveRunwayForUsage()->ident() for determining the active runway. There is already code in tower.cxx that uses this. It seems to me that the landing clearance generated by tower.cxx could use the already-available information in a much more realistic way. We're not talking about rocket surgery. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
