On Monday 14 December 2009 12:11:15 pm Stuart Buchanan wrote: > > I think one statement can easily be used for both purposes if written > appropriately.
Agreed. That's actually what I was thinking of. > > I'd appreciate feedback, even if it is only to agree with the wording of > the statement, to ensure that we have buy-in for this. > In addition to the points brought up by others, I have one suggestion for a FAQ item: From the discussion on the flight simulator network, it struck me that people (especially those with a freeware background) don't necessarily understand why we are "allowing" third parties to make money off of FlightGear. I guess this is already covered by the "is it legal to resell" FAQ item, but maybe it's worth to specifically address this question from a different perspective (i.e. that of somebody coming from a freeware background)? Cheers, Durk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
