James Turner wrote:
> A related observation is that there is not much of a FG-sepcific Nasal
> 'standard
> library' for this kind of thing, so huge amounts of copy-and-paste goes on
> between aircraft. Sometimes there's five or ten copies of a given Nasal
> function
> in CVS, across different aircraft. If something is in C++, my hope is that
> people will prefer that to writing their own version.
We do, of course, have a set of standard Nasal libraries under data/Nasal/.
These were previously maintained by Melchior, who worked hard to ensure that
we didn't end up wth lots of slightly different per-aircraft functions.
Unfortunately at
present there isn't a clear owner of this, and it really requires buy-in from
the aircraft
developers to create generic functions and submit them rather than taking the
easy
way out and copy-and-pasting functions from other aircraft.
-Stuart
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
