Hmmm, the nav database had the actual radial alignment of the station
relative to true north and I remember sorting that out so that when you fly
off a chart, everything would be in chart-agreement when you flew to radial
intersection points.  Bummer if that got broke along the way ... I haven't
checked it recently.

Curt.

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:09 PM, David Megginson  wrote:

> There's a bug in the /instrumentation/nav/radials/selected-deg
> property: the code mistakenly assumes that the selected radial is in
> true degrees, but isn't a bearing -- it's just a number.  You could
> design a VOR where radial 180 was north of the VOR, if you wanted to
> (though usually it's close to a bearing in *magnetic* degrees).  The
> bug affects the --nav1 and --nav2 option in particular, since
>
> --nav1=340:114.6
>
> will no longer start FlightGear with the Nav1 indicator dialed to the
> 340 radial, unless the local magnetic variation happens to be 0.  At
> CYRO, for example, the actual radial ends up being closer to 326,
> which is counterintuitive.  Nav radios and indicators know nothing
> about magnetic variation.
>
> We used to have this right in FlightGear, but it's gotten messed up
> over the last 3-4 years.  I'd like to fix it, but I'm worried about
> how many places we've hardcoded this assumption.  How hard will it be
> to correct this?  How many of you have designed radios, autopilots,
> etc. counting on this bug?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> David
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>



-- 
Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to