On Sunday 2010-03-28 David Megginson wrote:
> Now, quite a few years later, the Great Lakes are still
> broken in our default scenery, and as a result, FlightGear
> looks ridiculous to any new user who comes and tries flying
> in near cities such as Toronto, Rochester, Buffalo, Cleveland,
> Detroit, Chicago, or Milwaukee.

Sometimes pictures really *are* worth a thousand words. I think
this is one of those times.

I've put up on the Web (temporarily: they won't be there forever)
three screen snaps:

Please go to http://www.vex.net/~slocombe/fgfs-pics-of-CYTZ/ for
pictures illustrating the problems of CYTZ (Toronto/City Centre),
which is on an island in Lake Ontario just offshore from Toronto's
downtown area.

1. cytz-from-08-apprch.png : CYTZ from the approach viewpoint
of Runway 08 (08/26 is the principal runway of this extremely
busy airport: Bombardier Dash8-Q400's take off or land about
every 20 minutes, and in between that traffic Cessna 150's and
172's practise circuits or transit to/from Toronto's
"practice area" to the East. I'm one of the student pilots these days.

The fact that, in fgfs, the water is 240 feet below its real-world level
is only a small part of the problem (in fact if that were the
only problem one could just pretend one is practising landings
on aircraft carriers). The terrain data, intersected by the
water at its current level, makes the shoreline wildly wrong...

2. cytz-overhead-at-40Kft.png : This is taken with the UFO
tool at 40,000 ft., looking straight down.

3. google-image-cytz.png : a snap of what Google has for
a satellite shot, to compare with the previous shot.

I'm not convinced that the terrain data that fgfs uses is
sufficiently detailed to capture even the approximate
shape of the Toronto Islands (what CYTZ is on the Western
end of), let alone the Leslie Spit and docklands to the East.
So I'm not sure how different this is going to look if the
water-level were correct. But surely it would make a difference,
and there are > 700 miles of shoreline for Lake Ontario,
and another > 800 miles for Lake Erie: all of this would
be affected by a "fix". I presume the shoreline in the
St. Lawrence River near Montreal must be seriously wrong too.

BTW, Just For Kicks, I can fly *under* CYTZ. It doesn't
seem to do me damage, and fgfs doesn't even crash! :-)

Thanks everyone for the great achievement that fgfs is.
It was fgfs that got me sufficiently enthused about flying
to decide to get my PPL.

David Slocombe
Toronto Canada.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to