Martin Spott wrote: > As far as my memory serves (I might be wrong and I'm currently not in a > position to check) someone's been posting plausible objections against > at least one patch for the B787 which (the objections) had never been > adressed.
Yup, here's the respective posting: http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg25828.html As far as I understand this means: The patch doesn't contain the proper fix. Therefore I've refrained from committing to CVS (now: GIT). Looks like the patch needs a patch ;-) Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
