thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
>> I'd be interested to run such a comparison myself. Could you translate
>> the described conditions into a set of command line parameters against
>> 'default' FlightGear/GIT startup so I/we can make sure not to interfere
>> with local customizations ?
>
> I don't think it can be done from the command line - you'd have to go into
> the Nasal code.
Mmmmh, a multitude of parameters which are having effects on the
situation are easily set via properties and can thus be reliably
reproduced from command line. This includes but is not limited to
date, timeofday, METAR, visibility and all the nifty stuff which
controls the environment. At least this is what I've learned to be the
FlightGear way of providing a test case.
> The way I did the comparison [...]
Your rather elaborate pleadings make me feel that you've been
implementing a rather 'autonomous' (or 'uncontrollable') system for
setting weather effects, which - obviously - is destined to drive
people into a "comparing apples and pears" situation. Simply because a
certain setup is so hard to reproduce.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
