> Running through the same exercise for the p51d-jsbsim: > > FDM: 5 > Systems: 4 (still needs some electrical systems stuff) > Model: 3 (missing cooling door animation, liveries and Ambient > Occlusion > effect) > Cockpit: 3 (what is there is a 4 but it is missing a few things IE. not > complete) > > Total is 15 average is 3.75. For a developer this is very quick to do > as it > took me all of perhaps 2 minutes. In addition this has very few things > that > are at all subjective. I like it. > > ... > > Hal
I also think that the criteria laid out is good. One thing, though (and I apologize if this has already been discussed), but it might be fair to point out examples of a five somewhere for each category. The point being that can we really expect to find an aircraft model that is a solid 5? What is the "gold standard"? We know how much effort Hal has expended on the P51 flight model, and I will certainly agree that it rates a "5". Which aircraft models rate a 5 in which categories? Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
