On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:29:27 +0100, Erik wrote in message 
<1298230167.1769.4.camel@Raptor>:

> On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 12:46 -0500, Peter Brown wrote:
> > 
> > This is very true.  I've not explored the parameters of the 777 in
> > FG, but if you fly the MD-81 with no passengers, 1200 lbs of fuel
> > and crew weight, it is extremely different than flying with
> > standard fuel load and passengers.  Enough so that you can land,
> > and take off, from the Nimitz.  This is not as far-fetched as one
> > may think.
> 
> In fact this has been proposed for the F28; It was named the F-28 COD
> (Carrier On-board Delivery)
> http://eu.airliners.net/aviation-forums/military/read.main/43434/

...and appears to have come closer to reality than both the 
p1101 or the me262hg3, go for it. ;o)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to