Curtis Olson wrote:
[...]

I'm trying not to add yet another iteration to the debate about the two
terms "topologically correct" vs. "good enough", everything's already
been said (details upon request, if required), but I think one point
ought to be made very clear in this context, for those who are unaware
of the history of "terragear-cs".

> The terragear-cs fork has had substantial changes from my original terragear
> tree. [...] So the
> point is I let the fork happen, and let others take over management of
> terragear, because it was just far far beyond what I could handle thinking
> about at the time.

Stating that Curt "let the fork happen" could be quite misleading
because people might understand that the fork would have been 'planned'
in some way - which is entirely incorrect.  Instead, the fork was
actually nothing but the last resort after, within a period of ten !! 
months, Ralf Gerlich neither a) got a patch reviewed, which he had
submitted to Curt nor b) was given write access to the TerraGear CVS
repository.

I _do_ acknowledge that Curt might have his very personal reasons for
not considering Ralf's work then, but, let's be honest, what would
_you_ do when you feel like being stuck in a dead end for such a long
period as Ralf did, and would like to proceed in what you started ?

Let me guess, I think you'd be creating a fork, and may it just be for
the sole purpose of having your own development versioned.  Nowadays
people are creating their own public forks (ah, "clones"  ;-)  of
"terragear-cs" before submitting _anything_ - which is't that bad at
all - as long as they're planning to submit their changes sooner or
later.

Cheers,
        Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to