On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:58:05 +0100, James wrote in message <91dd9863-f84a-4e33-a278-3d5f84ba7...@mac.com>:
> > On 26 Jun 2011, at 07:17, James Turner wrote: > > > Code wise, I have about 30% of this prototyped - but not at a point > > where it can be tested. Since it appears to be a hot topic, I am > > thinking i should revisit it for 2.5 :) > > I've tried to capture my current design/plans here: > > http://wiki.flightgear.org/Aircraft_deployment#Proposal_from_James ...(Keeping in mind the aircraft-manager tool has to run on Windows) ..would cygwin help us support the Windows crowd here, e.g. by using gygwin to call etc in the resources that Microsoft Windows doesn't support and that FG needs? > > It's only a proposal, and some prototype code, at this point - > nothing final yet. > > James -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
