James wrote > > > On 26 Jun 2011, at 07:17, James Turner wrote: > > > Code wise, I have about 30% of this prototyped - but not at a point > where it can be tested. Since it appears to be a hot topic, I am thinking > i should revisit it for 2.5 :) > > I've tried to capture my current design/plans here: > > http://wiki.flightgear.org/Aircraft_deployment#Proposal_from_James > > It's only a proposal, and some prototype code, at this point - nothing > final yet. >
This all looks good so far as it goes, but my main concern is that it looks as if it would involve a great deal of work. James is a busy man: is it over ambitious to expected a working and tested solution by release 2.5?. Do we need some form of interim solution to the pressing need to sort out FGData now? Vivian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
