Now I have to clarify: I assume Thorsten just did what he does since a while: fix bugs. Which is great. He probably either thought the bo105 is no longer maintained, or didn't know the (now obsolete?) maintenance principle. But there were certainly no bad intentions.
What I'm more concerned about are those people who apparently think that maintainers (who are usually the *creators* -- who spent hundreds of hours for an aircraft) should just shut up and let others interfere without complaining. Now, you may claim that by not committing much in a long time to the bo105 I have already given up maintenance. Wrong. As long as I haven't explicitly said so and am still reachable via email in a reasonable time, I have not. Of course, I have plans to continue the bo105. But guess who makes the schedule? m. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
