On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:35:36 +0200, Tim wrote in message <CAPK_1fyWbxLuo=1HaCjhD32E95D7pTSRoa=a75_01o_7pbl...@mail.gmail.com>: > > To make this easier, I should add a couple of people from the modeling > side of the house as administrators of the Flightgear project on > gitorious. However, before I start adding repositories for completely > new aircraft, we should think about why new aircraft should be under > the Flightgear project. > > Pros: centeralized location for obtaining aircraft, Flightgear "seal > of approval" > Cons: Flightgear project has to manage new repos, aircraft must be > under the license that Flightgear chooses (GPL)
..I see a pro here, FG main repo management can check for GPL automatically, simply check the aircraft repo license, if it is not GPL, FG does not manage or clone it. ..end users remain free to pick whatever aircraft from wherever they please. > Other thoughts? Perhaps the wiki would be a better place to > promulgate aircraft! Tim -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FREE DOWNLOAD - uberSVN with Social Coding for Subversion. Subversion made easy with a complete admin console. Easy to use, easy to manage, easy to install, easy to extend. Get a Free download of the new open ALM Subversion platform now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
