On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Tim Moore wrote: > At the moment, James Turner or I would create a repo in the Flightgear > project that clones yours. I think we would give you commit rights in > that new repo. > > To make this easier, I should add a couple of people from the modeling > side of the house as administrators of the Flightgear project on > gitorious. However, before I start adding repositories for completely > new aircraft, we should think about why new aircraft should be under > the Flightgear project. > > Pros: centeralized location for obtaining aircraft, Flightgear "seal > of approval" > Cons: Flightgear project has to manage new repos, aircraft must be > under the license that Flightgear chooses (GPL)
On the "Pros" side the FlightGear project would also be a natural place for the aircraft to remain in case the original author stomps off in a huff or goes missing for any other reason. A personal public repository is more likely to disappear altogether. OTOH since we use git anyone with a clone at the time would have the full (public) history of the aircraft in question at hand anyway. Cheers, Anders -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Gidenstam WWW: http://www.gidenstam.org/FlightGear/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
