On 4 Sep 2011, at 07:05, Durk Talsma wrote: > If not, I might consider moving the taxidraw source over to gitorious and > incorporate it as a subproject of fg. > > Any thoughts / ideas would be welcome.
I think this is best answer - for programs the original author wishes others to maintain / bugfix / enhance, they should live in the fg Gitorious project (not necessarily the flightgear repository, of course). This could potentially be done for Atlas, mpserver, and so on, if that helps development. Are there reasons *against* moving support programs into the fg project? Assuming the original developer is happy with other people on the flightgear committers list potentially apply patches / bugfixes, of course. Presumably we're require all such code to use the same license as FG or SG (i.e either GPL or LGPL) to avoid headaches and confusion. James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
