Am 12.11.11 20:00, schrieb Frederic Bouvier: >> Am 12.11.11 19:35, schrieb Frederic Bouvier: >>> Hi Yves, >>> >>>> Am 12.11.11 11:05, schrieb Frederic Bouvier: >>>>>> See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png >>>>> >>>>> And what about this one ? >>>>> http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png >>>> >>>> Hi Fred >>>> >>>> Looking to the bars and the stars I think the stars are probably >>>> too >>>> easy. The rating system introduced looks much more sophisticated. >>> >>> too easy ? I am not sure to understand what you mean >>> >> >> Fred, I meant it is "too easy" because the stars simplify the system >> to much, but I realize that the rating system is written down very >> sophisitcated, but indeed have 5 levels only ... so it is no >> difference for you probably. I was looking to the stars and thought, >> wow, we have 100 % cockpits etc. > > The rating system is not my invention. It is just an implementation > of what was discussed on the forum : > http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12193 > and described here : > http://wiki.flightgear.org/Formalizing_Aircraft_Status >
I know it is not your invention. What I mean is that bars and stars say nothing. Who gave the stars, what does it really mean? No info. The wiki page says a lot about the rating, and I don’t know if this is really is reflected now. It isn’t any fundamental critism, just some feedback. Cheers, Yves ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
