De Stuart Buchanan : > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Frederic Bouvier wrote: > >> See : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system.png > > > > And what about this one ? > > http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-rating-system-star-en.png > > Of the two, I prefer the stars. Great work. > > Out of interest, what are you planning to display if the aircraft > is not rated? "Not Rated"?
The system is open to partial ratings like this : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-ufo-rating.png On 13 November 2011 10:12, Curtis Olson wrote: > So now it would be interesting if fgrun could be used by end users to rate > the aircraft in the different categories and then fgrun would pull the > ratings from some server that tracks all this. :-) I don't think the rating system was meant as the result of a vote. Please refer to the original forum threads to know why. > I was looking to the stars and thought, wow, we have 100 % cockpits etc. There is no such 100% cockpit (that's what the bars were conveying) but there are 5 stars cockpits like there are 5 stars hotels. Regards, -Fred ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
