Peter Sadrozinski wrote:
> I think most of the work we are doing (alternate clipping library,
> 850 format) should be considered experimental, however. I'm pretty
> sure we want to keep the main branch concentrated on fixing problems
> with detailed landclass.
Sure, I didn't propose to put the experimental stuff into the main
_branch_ :-)
I'm just a bit unhappy that I'd have to check various _repositories_
(_plus_ various branches therein) in order to get an update about what
peple are actually doing about TerraGear. Experimental stuff is pretty
much what Git branches (or branches in general) are for - not making
use of this feature is probably the first step on the way to duplicate
work .... which would be quite a stupid incident in a volunteer
project where all participants are aiming at the same goal (at least
that's what I assume).
Thus, if you'd be willing to put your stuff into a branch at the main
repo, please go ahead - call us if you don't have write access.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
