On Wednesday 21 December 2011 04:09:35 Stuart Buchanan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > >> I prefer manually syncing and checking that the changes are valid, > >> rather than blindly over-riding what we've already got. > > > > Hi Stuart, > > > > this > > - <sin> > > - <property>aero/alpha-rad</property> > > - </sin> > > + <property>aero/alpha-rad</property> > > <value>-1.8000</value> > > > > reintroduces a bug, IIRC that had something to do with tailwind > > behavior. I think we should keep the <sin> function. > > Agreed - that's a mistake in my checkin. I will correct it. > > -Stuart
I missed backporting this to the JSBSim side. I've also got an experimental FDM with many more of these wrapped in sine or cosine functions as appropriate. This will make the forces and moments trend in the correct directions, even if the magnitudes aren't quite right. Perhaps a improved stall system for JSBSim will be ready for 2.8 Ron ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
