Heiko Schulz wrote:
> I agree that OpenSource allows to add unfinished aircraft and that it
> can be a Plus for OpenSource.
> But that doesn't mean that you automatically have to do this!
No, there's no written law that you have to do it. But's it's the
well-known recpe behind the success of OpenSource - also known as
"Release early, release often". Therefore I'd recommend to continue
applying this rule @ FlightGear.
> We are cross-platform, and as there are many people out there using
> Mac or Windows, they aren't in OpenSource as you or others here are.
I think we should remind ourselves that FlightGear development is being
carried on mostly by developers, not by users. If you'd like to impose
the requirement to follow almost every (sometimes pretty braindead)
user habit onto FlightGear, then you're probably going to kill the
entire project.
I know, I'm exaggerating quite a bit, but the basic tendency is still
true.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
