On 02/17/2012 12:10 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote: > I agree that OpenSource allows to add unfinished aircraft and that it can be > a Plus for OpenSource. > But that doesn't mean that you automatically have to do this! > > It can be also a Minus as it seems for me as our system has been abused here, > and yes, the fact that all aircraft are downloadable without any sign of > their state may FGFS let look bad!
The reviewers could have also fly only from automatically-created airports and conclude that there are no airport buildings in FG. Is it a reason not to put "unfinished" airports in FG? Maybe the problem is that FG boasts hundreds of aircrafts instead of airports :-D. In my opinion the right way is to improve the unfinished a/c and not to banish them. That said, highlighting planes that are in the best state would be cool - e.g. filter in fgrun set to 'only those having at least 3-3-3-3 stars' by default or a status on a splashscreen. Edheldil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
