Renk Thorsten wrote:
>> I'd say the timescale is of subordinate relevance as long as the design
>> is ok and integration with the scenegraph is proper ....
>
> I know you'd say this...
Great to know that you didn't forget about it ;-)
> A project isn't just [...]
When balancing different arguments I'd recommend to consider this one
as well: Backing out a kludge after it's been adopted by the users,
detangling additional hacks which start building on top of the
mentioned kludge is highly ungrateful work most of the time.
Thus, by pushing a kludge into FG or any other collaborative work, you
(or whoever would do it) are also multiplying the effort which is
required to later install a 'clean' solution. That's not very nice,
because most of the time those who've been responsible for the
additional work usually are not the ones who participate in the
cleanup.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
