On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Martin Spott <martin.sp...@mgras.net> wrote: > Moin Yves, > > ys wrote: > >> [...], it's just in responsability of the core developers to show how >> "2nd-row" developers can help to improve apt.dat without being >> blocked by a deprecated. > > I tend to disagree. > > You're probably asking for a recipe on how to square a circle ;-) > According to my experience there's little chance to establish a > procedure having the potential to stand real practise without a couple > of wise guys making terrible noise, claiming they're "blocked". > > Therefore I think trying to guide "2nd-row developers" is a waste of > time in most cases.
How does scenery production, including airport modeling, scale without 2nd (and 3rd and 4th)-row developers? Tim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
