Martin wrote:
> "Alan Teeder" wrote: > > > Twice I left it running overnight, but it failed both times after > > several hours during the fgdata clone. > > Which server do you clone from ? If you don't already do so, then you should > consider fetching the initial clone from mapserver and to change the remote > origin afterwards. > > > The fact remains that I believe that the current fgdata is too large > > and is not fit for purpose. The need to re-organise it exists now, as > > it did last year. Perhaps you, or someone else, could comment on that. > > Indeed, the current evil is asking for a *clever* solution but every of those > I've seen so far (at least most of them) had been ignoring one or another > quite relevant context and I think we're not well-advised to embark on yet > another significant evil to get rid of the current one. > > I don't know the 'perfect' recipe either. My favourite would be to keep just > the default Cessna in the base package and to move all the other aircraft into > one single, separate repo .... but as far as I remember, this plan doesn't have > much support (for various reasons, I guess). > Yes, that would be an obvious plan, but the elephant in the room is that it is the Aircraft folder which contains the bulk of the problem, so as you said, we swap one evil for another. I suppose if there were an answer to this problem we would have implemented it by now. Vivian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
