"Alan Teeder" wrote:
> Sorting out the aircraft is then a completely separate problem, and several
> solutions to this have already been proposed. As we all remember one was
> actually implemented last year, but for various reasons not made fully
> public , was promptly abandoned.
You might try searching the list archives for a posting by Durk in the
first half of November last year.
I've carefully avoided to declare my "favourite" as a "suggestion" or
even a "recommendation" because I know it has several drawbacks ;-)
Keeping just the C172 in the Base Package has downsides, keeping the
release-hangar has downsides, installing various hangars by aircraft-
type or level of fidelity has downsides, installing one repo per
aircraft has downsides as well .... I'm pretty much convinced that the
most beneficial and most appropriate solution has not yet been posted
to this list.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
