I'm not sure about the benefits of a 3-d panel over a 2-d panel, since I'm new to this stuff, but I believe that it would be 3-D panels.
> > Hmm, when you say you'd like to make an instrument panel - do > you mean a 3d > 'virtual' one such as we have in the c172p, pa28-161, 310-3d > etc or a 2d > panel? > > Incidentally - for much of the 3d modelling in FlightGear, > AC3D is easiest > while Blender with its .ac export filter is most powerful. > > As for visualisation 'while you work', I generally use trial > (careful thought) > and much error but its possible that there are other methods > available which > I haven't found yet. > > On Monday 20 Dec 2004 23:47, Bill Galbraith wrote: > > I'm looking to develop an instrument panel or more, and was > wondering > > about tools for doing that. Ideally, what I'd like is: > > > > o Windows or Cygwin. Worst case, RedHat Linux > > o Free would be good. > > o XML support (or course) > > o Free (my favorite price) > > o A tool that allowed you to edit the code in one window of the > > screen, and show the rendering in another part of the screen. Being > > able to drive needles etc would be good too, to allow me to > set up the > > interpolations. o Wizards or other assistance for setting up > > instruments would be nice too. > > > > Can anyone point me in the right direction? > > > > Thanks, > > Bill Galbraith > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Flightgear-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users > > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/fl> ightgear-users > > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d > > _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
