Curtis L. Olson wrote :
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Quoting "Curtis L. Olson" :
EGNX runway 09 now appears as 09x. 27 is ok.
This is a side affect of the new X-Plane apt.dat format. Frederic, we need to strip out those x's now.
What is the right value to give to fgfs ? 09 or 09x ?
FlightGear strips out the "x" when it loads the database so internally (and for the command line options) we use 09. I'm not sure why X-Plane went with 09x. I suspect their data file parser is not the most brilliant/flexible. But it's easier for us to roll our eyes and put up with that sort of thing than to maintain a different format of the same data.
Done in fgrun's CVS
-Fred
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
