Josh Babcock Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: > > On July 28, 2005 12:36 pm, Vivian Meazza wrote: > > > >>There was a theory going the rounds that it was the PAPI/VASI lights > which > >>were/are the cause of the significant drop of frame rate around > airports. > >> > >>Vivian > > > > Why can't just model them? > > > > It is ridiculous to see each light taken only 4 pixels when the camera > is only > > a few meters away. > > > > Ampere > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Flightgear-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users > > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d > > > > I agree. Melchior's anticollison lights don't really hit performance at > all. Given a property to tell them what color to be, this should be > pretty trivial. >
I'm not sure that the PAPI/VASI lights are the problem. The FLOLS on the carrier does the same job and they are quite vertex intensive, but don't pull the frame rate down noticeably. Vivian _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
