Hi, The whole problem is that MS-Windows users are quite prepared to use the better products from the Open Source world, but are at the same time simply too stupid and/or too lazy to work on those projects themselves ;-)
If "they" think FlightGear is "worthy of MSWindows" (I wouldn't be proud of it ...) they should simply start contributing to it ..... There is no such thing as a free meal, albeit it may not be money you'll have to invest this time ;-) Bye, Kees Lemmens PS : Eric Brasseur , thanks for your excellent contribution (the tutorial) ! On Monday 03 October 2005 18:55, Gerard ROBIN wrote: > Le lundi 03 octobre 2005 à 18:46 +0200, Arnt Karlsen a écrit : > > On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 18:28:25 -0400, Ed wrote in message > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > If Flightgear plans to draw a large audience > > > > ..precisely. "If". ;o) > > > > > (and I think it is worthy of it), the Flightgear community HAS TO > > > REALIZE that they MUST appeal to the MS-Windows community. That's > > > just > > > > ..bull. You are welcome to compare the merits of what you have > > experienced with Wintendo, with what you learn with FlightGear. ;o) > > > > > the facts ... it's not an opinion, it's not an "us versus them" > > > scenario. It's just what it is. There's no denying it. > > > > ..this sounds more like some MSFS folks bracing themselves for the > > Horrors of Capitalism, like in "Competition on Tech etc Merits." ;o) > > "Bring it on!" ;o) > > Your remarks sound to me like a Sibelius Symphony :-)))))) _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d