Le mercredi 05 octobre 2005 à 13:58 +0100, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
> Erik Hofman wrote
>
> Vivian Meazza wrote:
> >
> > > It was removed to allow landing on carriers - you can have one or the
> > other
> > > but not both right now.
> >
> > I believe (but I'm not 100% sure) that the deck of an AC has to be
> > declared solid in the configuration files, so in theory both should be
> > possible.
> >
>
> Mathias needs to answer this one really, but you are correct that the deck
> (and other parts) of AC have to be declared solid - then you can land on
> them, or hit them, but not fly under them. Similarly, if the deck of a
> bridge is solid you can land on it, hit it, but not fly under it. If you do
> not make it solid, you can fly under it, but not land on it or hit it.
> Similarly hangars.
>
> Since flying under bridges is mostly illegal, and taxiing in hangars is bad
> airmanship (except for hardened shelters designed to allow taxiing) ...
>
> No doubt Mathias could fix it up, but as I said: right now, one or the
> other.
>
> Vivian
>
>
Because i am using hardened shelters and start from it, i discovered
that "non function"
when using CVS mainly because of the last new facilities ("--carrier=
--parkpos=" thanks to the author)
It seem we have differences between AI models and static models.
I have not tried to declare my shelters AI model.
Cheers
BTW: When flying under bridges i am have never been arrested by any
policeman :-)
--
Gerard
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
