Well thats really sad that this is a known bug and a solution cannot be found. I therefore think that it should not be released in the default base package, because it kinda makes the plane pretty much unflyable - real pity as the cockpit is so lovely done.
Regards Shelton. Quoting Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Curtis L. Olson wrote: > > However, I know Andy's intension was to produce "plausible" behavior > > across all flight regimes as best as can be guessed at, and there is > > clearly a bug where stalls come *way* to early in the negative aoa > > regime. > > Yes, this is a real bug. It's not the "stall" per se, I think, but a > discontinuity somewhere in the lift curve. Every time this comes up I > end up re-reading the (admittedly hairy) Surface.cpp code looking for > it, and get lost. The stall handling itself, though, is fairly > transparent and looks clean. Something else is going on. > > I should probably take some time and write up a test rig that graphs > the lift curve that emerges from the model, but that requires > generating a Surface object with real world coefficients, which > requires running it through the solver on a real model, which has > interactions that kinda obscure the "pure" behavior of the Surface. > Ick. :( > > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-users mailing list > Flightgear-users@flightgear.org > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d > ------------------------------------------------------------ This email was sent from Netspace Webmail: http://www.netspace.net.au _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
