* Frederic Bouvier -- Wednesday 19 April 2006 16:46: > It looks very neat, but I have the feeling they are a bit oversized, because I > don't remember seeing such large sign last time I took a commercial flight ( > my > local airfield is just that : a field with no signs ). > > Could be a foot/meter conversion, or just my memory ?
Neither. The size is correct for "Size 3" taxiway signs according to the FAA specification[1]. This is the default size in the sg implementation, because I didn't/don't have the slightest idea what's the most common size. Size 1 ... 46 cm (18 in) ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Size 2 ... 61 cm (24 in) ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Size 3 ... 76 cm (30 in) ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] or just [EMAIL PROTECTED] I expect more things to be wrong in my example. There are definitely signs missing, and probably some wrong (hey, maybe all are wrong. :-) I'll change the default if Size 1 or 2 are more common. m. [1] http://www.google.com/search?q=5345-44g ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
