dave perry wrote: > Thanks Jon, > > I have not used jsbsim to model any aircraft in flight gear. So I was > not aware of where the adverse-aileron yaw was modeled in jsbsim. I was > only reacting to what seems to me a very exaggerated response. Perhaps > we need to consider such a scaling as default as the c172p also seems to > suffer from this exagferated yaw response. > > -Dave Perry > > > Dave -
I tried the 0.3 scale factor. It does calm things down a bit for OSG version. I believe, however, that something else is going on with the A/P during ILS approach. I do not get the behavior you report on approach. The A/P begins to make large over corrections about one mile out, to the point where I need to disable the A/P & make the approach manually using the HSI. Not good if in poor IMC conditions with no visual refs. until at DH (~200 ft). Perhaps this is another OSG vs. PLIB difference (although I cant see how)? Im running Linux Fedora 8. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
