Okay there is now a branch with this and the trunk has been reverted. Sorry I did not intend to check this in yet but I needed to get the changes off a Windows machine that was being used to develop it.
Now that I know how to make a branch (thanks for those scripts!) I can try to do this correctly. I never figured out why svn thinks you have to remember the revision numbers, but your script makes them be stored so that "merge all the changes since I did it last time" is the simple operation it should be. And because the numbers can be directly altered, I was able to revert the trunk and make the branch think it branched from that trunk version. Michael Sweet wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> Author: spitzak >> Date: 2007-05-13 17:58:07 -0400 (Sun, 13 May 2007) >> New Revision: 5821 >> Log: >> Made the base widget class have children widgets, rather than the Group >> subclass. This is similar to GTK and should remove a number of kludges >> and rtti tests, and allow buttons and other widgets to be decorated >> with child widgets.. Some code needs to be fixed as Widget::parent() >> returns >> a Widget* rather than a Group*. >> >> This is still a work in progress, as the basic Widget does draw or do >> anything with it's children, and several widgets such as menus are >> still subclasses of Group rather than of Widget. > > Bill, I'm going to be blunt here: MAKE A FUCKING BRANCH FOR DISRUPTIVE > CHANGES YOU AREN'T FINISHING IN A SINGLE COMMIT. It is trivial to do, > you can even use some simple shell scripts I've created for this at: > > http://www.easysw.com/~mike/svn-cheat.html > > Breaking things in trunk just pisses people off, and trunk is already > unstable enough as it is... > > Thank you! > > PS: I'm not saying that I don't welcome these changes, but I'd > welcome a complete changeover more than a partial commit that by > your own admission won't compile... > _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
