> > The makefile must then be either: > > - taken into consideration in all platforms using the unix makefiles. > > - removed and all compilation should be then done in src > > In all cases, something has to be done with the makefiles if you want to > > handle that correctly so this is why yourfix is dangerous to me, because it > > hides another bigger problem in the makefiles. > > > > I'll vote +1 for keeping it and make it work instead of making our life > > easy and continuing to popukate the src directory. > > -1 for adding another Makefile level. Instead, the obsolete Makefile > should be removed or at least renamed (to Makefile.unused?) to prevent > people from running make with this old Makefile. > > There is more cleanup needed in the xutf8 directory and maybe its > subdirectories. This should be done when the utf8 work continues or when > it is finished. > > For now, I did re-apply my change to the existing src/Makefile to fix > STR 2063 with the _current_ Makefile implementation. Please open another > STR if you think that this xutf cleanup needs on
It needs that you finish this work: you decided to ignore this Makefile without waiting for a consensus about it, it's bad. At least you should remove this xutf8 makefile to avoid confusion and assume what you are doing, meaning that you'll also make your best to fix it if a problem happens after that ... Your work is unfinished for now and you don't let time to others to give their opinion, this is not the way it goes Albrecht. If it is so hard for you to make a complete fix, or wait for others opinion, or you feel you don't have the time ; please don't do it instead of doing half-work and wasting our time (at least mine). Fabien _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
