> Again: I wanted to fix STR 2063, I did it, and that work WAS complete. No it is not for me, because there is a Makefile in xutf8 supposed to do it that is still in the svn and that does not do what it is supposed to do.
>You reopened it for no real reason, and YOU wasted MY time. The real reason is that it is not sufficient and dangerous to hide the xutf8 pseudo-usefulness problem by ignoring it while letting it in svn. >You also reverted my change without understanding what it was good for, and >without asking me before you did it. That was very rude. Well, sorry if you felt it like this but this how it is done, when Mike did it to me not so long ago, I took this opportunity to make a better fix and thanks him for that. Also, I did understand your fix, and I am pretty sure that this xutf8 Makefile is being used in some target but decided you could have a look yourself as you're on. > > End of discussion, I don't want to waste more time with this. Sorry but you don't decide either when a discussion is finished or not, but for sure ; with all the time I already spent to make you understand why something should be done, at least not closing this STR until the utf8 makefile related problem is fixed, I could have fixed the problem 3 times including the makefiles ... Fabien _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
