imacarthur wrote: > > On 10 Nov 2008, at 21:07, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > >> Further improvement might be: use png_get_valid for library testing >> instead of png_read_info. This would save one test. > > I'm less keen on this idea - I think maybe some old version of libpng > might not provide png_get_valid, but I think maybe all have > png_read_info, so png_read_info is better for testing the lib is > available...?
Good point, ACK. Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
