On 01.03.2010, at 18:07, Albrecht Schlosser wrote:

> The consequence would be to have better planning, a roadmap for ABI
> changes, shorter release cycles (with changing minor version numbers
> like 1.x) and (as before) the possibility to break the ABI with each
> minor version number change.
> 
> IIRC this was all on our roadmap anyway... :-)

IMHO 1.2 and 2.x died because nothing was ever officially released. I'd prefer 
to get the ABI "good enough" and release 1.3.0. When applied to the many apps 
out there, we will get plenty of feedback for fixing... . 

1.3 is already such a huge improvement over 1.1. We should really release it 
very soon!


 - Matthias


PS: I still believe that an "un-fork" of FLTK1 and FLTK2 into FLTK3 is 
essential to  modernize FLTK and get new users while keeping (and reuniting) 
the old ones.

_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Reply via email to