On 02.03.2010 at 10:08, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: > All, > > Some notes on testing r7187 of the printing patch on a few random > targets last night. > > OSX PPC 10.4.11: > > Build and runs OK. Not obviously slower than stock (though this > particular machine is slow by modern standards anyway...)
That's good news. The slower it is, the more you would realize a slowdown effect (because it would use more additional CPU time). At least in a direct comparison. > My offscreen tests worked OK, and printed OK. > Other tests seem to be OK - though I forgot to run my Cairo test... > > A lot of build-time warnings about "class FL_xyz has virtual functions > with non-virtual destructor" type stuff. Hmm, we fixed some already, but this is important. Can you tell us which Fl_xyz this was about? > This is building from the Makefile with the stock Apple gcc, I wasn't > using Xcode. > > > Win Vista with Msys/mingw: > > I set this box up to try and look for the "zombie process" that Domingo > reports, so it has mingw with gcc-3.4.5 and Msys on a stock Vista box. > > Again, all seems well, for the most part. > Again, I forgot to run my Cairo test... > My offscreen test works and prints out OK. > My GL test ran OK, but the contents of the GL window did not print - is > that expected? I thought I'd heard that was fixed now? They can be printed, yes, but they don't print as subwindows by default, AFAIK. > None of the tests left behind this zombie of which Domingo speaks - I > don't know what is different between our setups though... Maybe because Domingo used the XPS printer. I tried it on Windows 7 and it worked w/o zombies. Interesting with XPS: There are lots of missing lines etc., but (... surprise, surprise ...) transparency works. The image with alpha draws with the white X in the background, and the pixmap is drawn w/o the black bg. I wouldn't bother to look for bugs in our code, though (WRT missing lines). That's probably a MS / XPS fault. > Didn't try any linux tests - ran out of time. I assume others have dome > so already, of course. > > Also, I didn't try any postscript output on either host. Thanks for testing and the report! Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
