On 7 Mar 2010, at 9:09, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
> Now that you alert me about coding standards I did ask my friend > google > and he told me about this tool: > http://invisible-island.net/bcpp/bcpp.html I'm surprised you did not just use gnu "indent". It is very powerful, and available by default on most systems. (I thought you were using gnu tools on your win32 box? If so, you probably already have gnu indent installed.) As far as the coding standard and the CMP, I have to say that I do not like the format that it mandates much either (in fact I suspect no one really does) but we have to have something that is an agreed standard, even if it doesn't really suit anybody... So, rather than suggesting tools to retrospectively fix the problem (which never quite works - in particular these tools often mangle doxygen comment formatting, which is a Bad Thing) you are best just writing the patch in the "approved" style. Of course, you can develop the patch in any style you like, but then submit the actual patch in the correct format and all will be well. If you submit patches that are inappropriately formatted there is a very real chance they will be ignored, as no one has the time to fix other peoples mess, however clever of useful the fix might be! _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
