On 04.04.2010, at 22:58, Duncan Gibson wrote: >> Hello from an interested onlooker (and sole developer of an obscure >> FLTK2 fork); hopefully you don't mind (tell otherwise) me joining in >> with a few thoughts. > > Just curious, what do you do with this obscure FLTK2 fork? > > Could we tempt you back to be the sole developer of the main FLTK2 fork? > :-)
Ha ha. No. I used FLTK2 for over a year on a daily base, and I like it. However, FLTK1 has some very nice new features now. > Seriously though, it would be useful if we could get some FLTK2 bods > back on board to help Matt with this FLTK2 to FLTK3 interface layer. Yes, that would be awesome. Four things are essential for this work or it will be obsolete: 1: the resulting FLTK3 must be independent, but provide a near perfect wrapper to FLTK1 and FLTK2 2: new FLKT3 code can be added to existing FLKT1 and FLKT2 projects 3: it should be modern and include all features from FLTK1 and FLTK2 4: it has to be dome very quickly, or the old libraries will start changing again If all that is put together, I hope that all FLTK1 and FLTK2 users can jump to FLTK3 soon. - Matthias _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
