> Yes, I see your point. I also checked out DirectFB and was quite surprised 
> what a beast it has become. Transparen rotatabe windows? How can that be any 
> smaller or faster than X11?

Actually the things are not so bad. The chief purpose of DirectFB is
support of hardware possibilities. Of course, the software fallbacks
will do such conversion with quite slow speed.
But when I tried to blit a picture with transparency and rotation
using dfb hardware driver (e.g. on embedded system via OpenGL ES) I
had only small delay against the simple blitting.

_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Reply via email to