On 08.12.2010, at 16:05, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > There's an optional #define to use winsock 1 (winsock.h, wsock32.dll) > instead of winsock 2 (winsock2.h, ws2_32.dll) that's used somewhere > in the source files. Should we really still try to support winsock1? > > I propose to remove winsock1 support, since this is long outdated.
+1 _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
