+1 On Dec 8, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
> There's an optional #define to use winsock 1 (winsock.h, wsock32.dll) > instead of winsock 2 (winsock2.h, ws2_32.dll) that's used somewhere > in the source files. Should we really still try to support winsock1? > > I propose to remove winsock1 support, since this is long outdated. > > Comments? > > Albrecht > _______________________________________________ > fltk-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev ________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
