On 21/12/10 18:06, Matthias Melcher wrote:

> We have never agreed on an integrated scripting language for FLTK.
> Actually, we had exactly as many submissions for different script
> interfaces as we had submissions ;-) .
>
> So I want to use the occasion to suggest NewtonScript as the FLTK
> integrated scripting language ;-P

So if I vote +1 on NewtonScript does that make it the winner then?!

;-)



_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev

Reply via email to