On 04/05/12 19:41, Greg Ercolano wrote:
> On 04/05/12 16:26, Fabien Costantini wrote:
>> Today, I would vote for removing the visual studio 2xxx ide projects and
>> stick with cmake.
>
> I'd like to use cmake, but it's distressing that it isn't native
> to any of the OS's we support. ('Command not found' on OSX/Lion,
> Linux/Centos5, and Windows)
>
> If cmake were something we could include in the FLTK package,
> I'd be for it. Is it a pretty tight tool?
>
> I know that I can get FLTK to build on Windows with gmake
> by just including a gmake.exe and some Makefiles specific to MS.
Oh, and I'd maybe be up for your suggestion from a few years
ago to use .bat files for building FLTK with VS.
Adding gmake.exe just adds dependency date stamp checking,
which is useful for development, but not really needed for
end user builds.
Still, it'd be nice to have the developer build technique
be the same one end users use.
Which is why I think it'd be useful to just include a gmake.exe
tucked away in the FLTK tar file, so that a gmake.bat script can
be used to access it.
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
