On 6 Apr 2012, at 03:41, Greg Ercolano <[email protected]> wrote: > If cmake were something we could include in the FLTK package, > I'd be for it. Is it a pretty tight tool?
I was under the (probably mistaken) impression that it might be possible to use cmake like we use autotools, i.e. the packager runs it when making the tarball to generate project files the end-user will need..? Then the users might not need cmake at all, but we could still leverage it to create various IDE project files for us. Or I may be wrong... In any case, Matt has implemented something like that in fluid3 so that may be the way of the future! -- Ian Sent, much to my surprise, from my iPhone _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
