Greg Ercolano wrote: > ... > (kids, you may want to cover your eyes.. here comes the 'f' word) > If 1.x is discontinued, I perceive there's enough momentum > to cause.. a code fork.. (there I said it) that would last at least > until 2.x stabilizes to the point where it simply obsoletes the > 1.x branch, and the 1.x folks can jump over to a stable 2. > ...
FWIW, if there *are* people interested in pushing 1.x forward (I'm one of them), there is no reason to fork. We just create a new 1.2 branch from 1.1.x and move forward on fltk.org. -- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike at easysw dot com Internet Printing and Publishing Software http://www.easysw.com _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
